From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47074: Replace XPM icons with Unicode codepoints in customize/widgets Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:27:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg50jhq3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a6r9mwgk.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x1mpdk.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupgltmi.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupgjk0b.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, stefan@marxist.se, 47074@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 20:28:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnSf-0003RU-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 20:28:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnSe-0007lI-4d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnS6-0007jf-13 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnS5-00065t-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnS5-0006NB-Kz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47074.161557722824435 (code B ref 47074); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 19:27:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnRD-0006M3-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnRB-0006LY-Ne for 47074@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnR5-0005R0-6B; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1604 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKnR2-0007CN-L7; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:26:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Third on Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:43:44 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202191 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:43:44 +0000 > From: Alan Third > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 47074@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Simply that we're inserting an image and to change it we'd have to > > > regenerate it. > > > > Even if some attributes of the image spec reference variables? > > Yes, it's inserted into the buffer as a simple list, I believe, so > changing the variables doesn't affect the existing image spec. We could change that, though. Like supporting :eval in the spec or somesuch.