From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 18:59:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83sg2pxq63.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86pmyghqf1.fsf@upmc.fr> <425cd7715bc9fae8b39a@heytings.org> <831ra9zi4x.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715bda5353110e@heytings.org> <83y2chxvg4.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715b4c15a15813@heytings.org> <83v97lxu0f.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12970"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gregory@heytings.org, 48042@debbugs.gnu.org, harven@free.fr To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 14 18:16:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaU0-00033O-Vo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 18:16:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaTz-0001bW-Vb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaEN-0008Hl-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaEM-0003UQ-RY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaEM-0001ua-Oe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48042 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 48042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48042.16210079577102 (code B ref 48042); Fri, 14 May 2021 16:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 15:59:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaDc-0001qT-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaDa-0001po-23 for 48042@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:59:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaDT-00032Z-1m; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3701 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhaDR-0006Je-PO; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:59:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 14 May 2021 11:51:41 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206533 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Gregory Heytings , harven@free.fr, > 48042@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:51:41 -0400 > > BTW, another possible way to attack the problem is to arrange for the > code that pushes to `unread-command-events` to use events of the form > `(t . EVENT)` so as to tell explicitly that we don't want them recorded. Maybe we will do something like that, or maybe we'll decide something else. But before we do that, I'd like to have a good understanding how the current code malfunctions and why.