From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 09:32:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83sg2nur25.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83mtsxzund.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> <835yzjwbnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516044215.23yd5ae3yeby6kaq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83zgwvuu5z.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516060512.sx3go2zr35izujlo@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 16 08:34:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1liALt-0004LJ-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 08:34:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liALs-0007JD-Q4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKl-0006aw-Jj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKk-0000N6-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKk-00079t-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 06:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.162114676227491 (code B ref 48408); Sun, 16 May 2021 06:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 06:32:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKQ-00079L-1B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKN-000798-Vr for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKI-00006S-QO; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3196 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liAKG-0008Ow-HX; Sun, 16 May 2021 02:32:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210516060512.sx3go2zr35izujlo@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Sun, 16 May 2021 02:05:12 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206638 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 02:05:12 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org > > I have several frames: at least one is definitely a gui frame (ie. it > appears in its own gui 'window' after being created via a gui menu which > seems to have accessed a gui emacsclient.desktop file), and at least one > is definitely a tty frame (ie. my original 'emacs -nw' invocation, from > within tmux). > > In performing the final test again: > > > > > (frames-on-display-list ":0.0") > > on tty frame: (#) > on gui frame: (#) > > So the output remains the same, but what you didn't ask me to report was > the mode line output, which differs: > > on tty frame: -UUU:@**--F139 *Ibuffer* > on gui frame: -UUU:@**-- *Scratch* > > Yes, the mode line displays a frame ID different than the > frames-on-display-list output. > > Frame 153 does exist: It is the frame created by my email client (mutt) > to compose this email message). So, it would be the most recent tty > frame created, although the GUI frame was created after. Quite a mess, huh. > Can you reproduce this? No, I don't have access to a system where I can create this situation, sorry. But I sent a potential fix a few moments ago.