From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30204: 27.0.50; Changing major mode resets non-default invisibility spec Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:50:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfyjtkp4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lf55cxvj.fsf@gnus.org> <97574057-8212-4812-93CF-0C2EC7EA8B39@gmail.com> <87ilzfo13i.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnvtlgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgsrmk75.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14482"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 30204@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 05 11:54:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMorO-0003e3-V6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 11:54:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53262 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMorO-0007cG-23 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonm-0004Jl-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonm-0001wd-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonm-00060p-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 30204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30204.163083545023093 (code B ref 30204); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2021 09:50:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMona-00060P-8s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54462) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonY-00060C-Ld for 30204@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonT-0001a6-3u; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2388 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMonS-00006z-NC; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:50:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zgsrmk75.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 05 Sep 2021 11:43:26 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213488 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 30204@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 11:43:26 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think this is a corner use case, and if there's no easy way of doing > > something better with it, we shouldn't do anything. > > Perhaps we should have a mode that even more fundamental than > fundamental-mode, that does a real cleanup of the buffer (removes all > text properties, overlays, etc), and just document that there are some > artefacts that may remain otherwise when changing modes? > > We could call it... fundamentalist-mode. We could. But my understanding of the original report is that it isn't limited to Fundamental mode, it expects a switch to _any_ mode to do the same.