From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53636: 29.0.50; face-remapping broken on master Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:57:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfssuoqt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o83tib13.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq19dk1.fsf@gnu.org> <87czk97yt6.fsf@gnus.org> <8335l49jwu.fsf@gnu.org> <835ypz8zbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsp2v0ky.fsf@gnus.org> <83leyu73i8.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0edrvxm.fsf@gnus.org> <83sft15egx.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0loxr9.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtj85tm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnibn48c.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kz4tgu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee4hg7g6.fsf@gnus.org> <83y22p21na.fsf@gnu.org> <871r0haqzr.fsf@gnus.org> <8335kw1n9u.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtj34mdj.fsf@gnus.org> <837da6yb0j.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0e5vqjm.fsf@gnus.org> <83o83hwngw.fsf@gnu.org> <87leykpiy0.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15805"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 53636@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 15:14:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnjW-0003vo-1N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:14:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnjU-0000vw-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 09:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnUs-0007Ym-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnUs-0007wj-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnUr-00083p-W8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53636 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 53636-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53636.164441508530914 (code B ref 53636); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53636) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 13:58:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnTx-00082Y-CR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnTs-00081z-Rb for 53636@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57422 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnTY-0007kg-NB; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:57:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=j7qMUbE+PIOgg1jy0K+7nfzK6QLKFxOCGPjW/UCK39s=; b=hgUc3Ic773kJ sDGdiJazRP3/9Wlxu60jzIcr5Y//MjGxmG3ZzMP3YNmJ4+9IEEdXQ32OpvezsQFmxB7SZzyMawYfr OSvRdwea6dm33vvUVVUggKdvsT80f3zyAao4BdiurPTENq4IoYXDljgFPAw5mPgpAbbTm2JtDQsp8 hiSVNAJUeP/eoyN0Zkc0/Zgg566fNJ++B0/O91A9Bq3DfdnS9AfhBeZKqc8kTlAbnT8/9wrrsx/5N ghsZqkVSETNzXOyuKJ7tFmJBZLH+0vC+GrUOXn5rSrgzfC8cM42Sns10+Bdso2/hs0kTQzgpqVrB0 wC5srJoXjEMqBpFYXWi8rQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2715 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHnTF-0000DL-RJ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 08:57:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87leykpiy0.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 09 Feb 2022 09:01:27 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226483 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 53636@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 09:01:27 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So: in the scenario you've shown, do we want *scratch* to have its > > mode-line remapped on the new frame, or don't we? IOW, I agree that > > the result ideally shouldn't depend on the buffer where make-frame is > > called, but I need to know what is the desired behavior in order to > > find code which produces the undesired results. > > Yes, I don't think that the results in the new frame should depend on > the current buffer when `make-frame' is called. OK, I think I know where this happens. Let me dig a bit.