From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57499: Documentation bug in the docstring of set-face-attribute? Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:08:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83sflbqotm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <534c9018d2adffda3e53@heytings.org> <831qswu0p4.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2f372cd7462@heytings.org> <83tu5ssi35.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d222586a161c@heytings.org> <83r10wsgu8.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2952b7a6bd0@heytings.org> <83pmggs89x.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2597d4fd752@heytings.org> <83fshcrzth.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2c911550778@heytings.org> <83czcgry5f.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2f901e88b93@heytings.org> <837d2nshh7.fsf@gnu.org> <834jxrscu7.fsf@gnu.org> <831qsvs51j.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32409"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 14:40:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjUd-0008Kj-DH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:40:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjUc-0006P5-Eu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTj0J-0002DI-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTj0I-0004W1-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTj0I-00034t-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57499 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D57499.166203411711792 (code D ref 57499); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57499-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2022 12:08:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTizs-000348-LA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTizr-00033v-1q for 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTizl-0004Rz-IT; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:08:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=o8o/ffi+s1cb/hnWGgI6NlQbWkVf8qrLl89IZnkRQD4=; b=pYnhGyeqiXRY 3fXUzHbH1uHT5eBoofhy2+zQkZ2qHit642Qi8gem9k3nvLiiGdPqg0HS2+3EJ2GFyWc8wsXUGTNm+ 4lZaR94gtz1puMqNkdRdRKW9Ocgz3XxdD/X/qYlKl711sh4YmDBqORLJFsr06MEXQH4cQkJzu2WGe GhBp/uVakbT6dtSbi4vdegzFSI/+1QjKcpvG0r96/EBsThclQbqJ4XTI87EpcAQaQStxrRkEXnQ3N 6V5WtQ21I3zdnS0ssHF+R5VdTwDzt5tQEV/vichCHpEdOCo+CuJsQjRVndRbD+0Ll7mZv961FrpEj TqMpN6HDxtz7MUT6CobJNQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2726 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTizi-0007ro-UN; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:08:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:56:06 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241257 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:56:06 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> Would the patch below be okay? This would be another way to clarify > >> the matter. > > > > No. I don't want to lose this compatibility feature because lots of > > people still use nil. > > > > Would a warning in *Messages* be okay then? We could try that, yes. But it has to be only in *Messages*, not an actual warning, since faces get merged and realized as part of redisplay, when signaling an error is a bad idea. > People who use nil with frame = t or nil will not get what they > expect, right? If they expect what you think they expect, yes.