From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.mail.notmuch.general,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bug#59147: 29.0.50; dispnew.c:1456: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: row >= 0 && row < matrix->nrows Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:06:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfiste7r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7tg718m.fsf@no.workgroup> <831qqcuuuc.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmdwgrvo.fsf@no.workgroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37561"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org, notmuch-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@public.gmane.org To: Gregor Zattler Original-X-From: notmuch-bounces-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@public.gmane.org Wed Nov 09 15:06:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: gmn-notmuch@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from yantan.tethera.net ([135.181.149.255] helo=mail.notmuchmail.org) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osliU-0009Ws-MZ for gmn-notmuch@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:06:10 +0100 Original-Received: from yantan.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA35F3B0; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E19885F35E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osliO-0007PZ-6V; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:06:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uPWyLHBQIelwsPMUSycDnnZCk61I2zHXhHhJ3PfMUmw=; b=fKOzsDFJVts3 KeM03/tj1QkXs3nUJntzjuaOVeO1PmdFrbXvg1/XusBhAmZTE71HD5DapR10PiXioC+h0OzEGF2vh RlWVE/8ShUjwicJLdScYSnYeC3cfdJ7tMqFXxrhBVmrIEJdDrN9tMi/JGLWm3rUS7WBQDS4AM/rue 1Ewn1DMcBa24Uo6RAYd/XUFaRJC9aDNVNHoJvXnJdusdW1YuZGrmXPb1bHD4dIJjwz6THFXNfImTV zwOQelqQUgJMVuUQkCijkJqZTM49zxzBCRfXHBDQrveSNUgQ+aC5z5ywAucyTFOngHIWNJ2HlgkZt UPVTNIgbRFstt3hLWbAszQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osliM-0003c6-Sx; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:06:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pmdwgrvo.fsf-BR+4T8zXX0yLKaosZrYv8g@public.gmane.org> (message from Gregor Zattler on Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:49:15 +0100) Message-ID-Hash: YJGM4YKFXMCZUXLQIWL2CWGDHDKQQKCQ X-Message-ID-Hash: YJGM4YKFXMCZUXLQIWL2CWGDHDKQQKCQ X-MailFrom: eliz-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.mail.notmuch.general:33900 gmane.emacs.bugs:247415 Archived-At: > From: Gregor Zattler > Cc: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org, notmuch-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@public.gmane.org > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:49:15 +0100 > > > What does the below produce: > > > > (gdb) frame 2 > > (gdb) p matrix->nrows > > (gdb) frame 2 > #2 0x000055555559d310 in matrix_row (matrix=0x55555d44d470, row=8) at dispnew.c:1456 > 1456 eassert (row >= 0 && row < matrix->nrows); > (gdb) p matrix->nrows > $1 = 7 > (gdb) Can you describe what does notmuch-jump do and maybe show its code? The backtrace seems to indicate that it reads from the minibuffer, but in that case, does it mean the mini-window was 7-lines high in this case? Also, can you describe what you do to trigger this assertion violation? > While working I got another (x)backtracei, in another emacs > daemon, which I guess is related: It's an exact same problem.