From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 05:24:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfcz9rf2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt3b4yfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87edonlsxi.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyf4vzb.fsf@gnu.org> <871qknllkj.fsf@posteo.net> <83fs934pjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfd2g2ek.fsf@gnu.org> <875y9yfxrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1muefks.fsf@gmail.com> <834jpifizy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd2e01f.fsf@gnu.org> <1a5e5837-513b-84d8-3260-cdbf42b71267@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40640"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, joaotavora@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 17 04:25:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1poEYb-000ALu-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 04:25:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poEYJ-0001PX-El; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poEYB-0001Ou-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poEYA-0005rj-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1poEYA-0004S6-0f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168169829517097 (code B ref 62720); Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2023 02:24:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1poEY2-0004Rh-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1poEY0-0004RQ-Ml for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:24:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poEXu-0005oL-5h; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:24:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uDs5eMWfc5rExxu4hSC1frbBujG2fWKd42eF0bcbGaM=; b=cQQdCdDym3SS lkDuov4Qu2VjTNX42wwQiFvDFJaN2w9gHbceOZp/PRW33aY1PXLMdvRUxdG54HRVfCSyMLAAUGQ55 PkPZQTROWRjw35SjQ38o6HmZ7REohMjggznIxhMJhJcXiNzFXHTmyw9F3qWiQ2M7Q91mcj+cZoyCS oEZaO4hLG6QLHJipDh9M1iRufufC22G1184unIUGrqnoY9KHtsl+dj3STVM0Tvo5TjkfXAu3VuIFq yzhPgcDRZ3RNfVThYIlzYieuV3o9hO0xUlFj9ZmLGGQu1+DTvCPPnuAipZqsWZVrqISG9Mkru5kaQ ILr2+cITsbxJEK0Z0vS1rw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poEXt-00011J-AX; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 22:24:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1a5e5837-513b-84d8-3260-cdbf42b71267@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 16 Apr 2023 23:46:37 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260162 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 23:46:37 +0300 > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 14/04/2023 22:28, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > If, OTOH, > > you think that it's imperative to allow_all_ users of Eglot with > > Emacs 29 to upgrade to Eglot 1.14 (and 1.15, 1.16, etc., when those > > become available), then we should release Emacs 29 with 1.14. > > Was this question about stability only? It was about the criteria for which versions of core packages to ship with a release. > Because since we've decided in favor of stability of package.el, and > against eglot's easy upgradability, I would suggest to backport Eglot > 1.14 to emacs-29. I won't object. In fact, I asked up front why not.