From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63589: [PATCH] 29.0.91; crash after creating graphical frames via emacsclient when compiled with cairo-xcb Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:10:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfbjlj12.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jo3yjly.fsf@yahoo.com> <837cszp9cc.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz2rw8pz.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1lfnqwb.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1lfuqyb.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wn0znn7j.fsf@gnu.org> <87lehevaqz.fsf@yahoo.com> <83r0r6o3zk.fsf@gnu.org> <87edn6v2v3.fsf@yahoo.com> <83h6s2ng1p.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8gisz6u.fsf@yahoo.com> <83bki9ohsc.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7m9tga9.fsf@yahoo.com> <83sfblm66s.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6s1t01w.fsf@yahoo.com> <83jzwwnatg.fsf@gnu.org> <874jo0u2bg.fsf@yahoo.com> <83cz2omyqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5xsrle0.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19854"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63589@debbugs.gnu.org, tmdmelo@gmail.com To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 26 08:11:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QfS-00050n-8N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QfI-0004KL-RA; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QfH-0004K9-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QfG-0006jF-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QfG-0006Ig-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 06:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63589.168508143924185 (code B ref 63589); Fri, 26 May 2023 06:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2023 06:10:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2Qet-0006I1-1r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q2Qer-0006Ho-6k for 63589@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2Qek-0006gP-7W; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:10:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZPEDX2XupWIKLrcblDf5y2HlA5z4CIVMv5/ZWTlgRzE=; b=lZgscHzNDWRL r4KSKVR3l532E05zON8QhuIfzix4aXVqjDtboVnqrP3jm8XfYwjh/hd3e3G1WZgsmVV+lO5Dze48M iS27Bm+TpXQdOOGdTJ3MX97WiTV1ctVXy4KgBZmTY+32aH9jFoDGUGHp4f1zslj9FTlWYYh/2d4nF 7y4HljXTJCZ4fdzIaz+Pcnxn20hfpk5RT65FHJDWFS4PtD5wLUZP851AXw6dJiYMdCeweJZ3MrlNZ P0OonEzw9S3CiNN4VT2TlcSurGDPZgYalik9yGtRc/cNrVLtkK0NlcMp+4HB9XhW3y8k1jKX1WQ// 0X29nojnhvzcawy0LiPuDg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2QeY-0005KI-1o; Fri, 26 May 2023 02:10:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a5xsrle0.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 26 May 2023 08:23:19 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262406 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: tmdmelo@gmail.com, 63589@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 08:23:19 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What bad things can happen (in the cairo-xcb build) if we don't delete > > the terminal in all these cases? > > In the former case, Emacs will never be able to close a display. Why is this bad? It isn't clean, I agree, but what problems would this cause to Emacs and the user, and why is this worse than the current situation where Emacs crashes? > In the latter case, the display connection is forcibly deleted, and the > same crash happens again. But that evidently happens already with other toolkits, doesn't it? So I guess these forced deletions are very rarely used. (Btw, I hope I understood correctly what you mean by "former" and "latter"; if not, please tell explicitly what they are, since the citations above don't include any two cases to which this could allude, so I needed to guess.) > > We did. > > OK, I will install this soon. Thanks.