From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11265: 24.0.94; gdb-mi very slow on Windows Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:30:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83r4vl6lzk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zkaaqo67.fsf@gnu.org> <4a9b5bb0b0553d31ee6df5994fd8a56d@schneider-inet.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334766732 5434 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2012 16:32:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11265@debbugs.gnu.org To: karl-heinz@schneider-inet.de Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 18 18:32:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnU-0006Zq-Dc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:32:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnT-0007JF-Re for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnO-0007J5-IZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnI-0000qC-BF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnI-0000q5-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXnV-0007me-WB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11265.133476667229860 (code B ref 11265); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2012 16:31:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXmd-0007lT-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:54551) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKXmY-0007kr-Ca for 11265@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2O00M00OJ34T00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 11265@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:30:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.105.225]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2O00LXJOJ2XMC0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:30:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4a9b5bb0b0553d31ee6df5994fd8a56d@schneider-inet.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59216 Archived-At: [Please keep the bug address on the CC list, so that this whole discussion gets archived.] > Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:53:16 +0200 > From: Karl-Heinz Schneider > > I discovered that the slowdown happens after restarting the process to > debug. > I did the following procedure: > > 1. Start the debugger (with process cmd-line). > 2. Enter run to start the process > 3. Debug the process > 4. Enter kill to stop the process > 5. Change code and recompile > 6. Start again with step 2 > > Doing this three or four times debugging starts to get slow. If you omit step 5, does the problem still happen? > All debugging is done within the gud buffer using GDB commands. If, instead of stopping the process in step 4, you kill the gud buffer through which you interact with GDB, do you still see the slowdown after several times that you kill and restart the debugging?