From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13065: Bug in x-file-dialog with GetOpenFileName Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83r4lvgydf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83liddr5u8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pq1fhlbo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357680422 1603 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2013 21:27:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13065@debbugs.gnu.org, duyanning@gmail.com To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 22:27:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghY-0003Se-Ab for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:27:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59749 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghI-0007ui-Mo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghF-0007pj-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghE-00059X-Nq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:26:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghE-00059T-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:26:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsghK-0007xq-Bm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13065 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13065-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13065.135768041030596 (code B ref 13065); Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13065) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2013 21:26:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsgh7-0007xQ-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:26:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsgh5-0007xB-Rj for 13065@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:26:48 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MGB00H00S50A900@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 13065@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:26:12 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MGB00H3DSVJAY20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:26:07 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87pq1fhlbo.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69517 Archived-At: > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: Du Yanning , 13065@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:10:35 +0800 > > > Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for chiming in. > > a) Windows 7 deprecated this kind of dialogs and instead wants us to > > use some hotshot new ones. So it could be simply a bug in the > > implementation of this dialog on Windows 7. > > Is it not just a case of doing the same as we did previously? > > /* If we compile with _WIN32_WINNT set to 0x0400 (for NT4 > compatibility) we end up with the old file dialogs. Define a big > enough struct for the new dialog to trick GetOpenFileName into > giving us the new dialogs on newer versions of Windows. */ Sorry, I don't understand: we still do what the above comment describes. Thanks for the other info. Unfortunately, I'm still clueless as to what could be causing the problem.