From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17073: 24.3.50; file-symlink-p doesn't return t as described in the doc Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:49:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83r45r1r08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877g7k1zij.fsf@web.de> <83vbv41ce8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395679812 14364 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 16:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 17073@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 17:50:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84r-0006M1-1E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:50:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84q-0007kh-NT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84g-0007Zk-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84a-0001gd-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:50:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84a-0001fB-0P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS84Y-00081d-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:50:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17073.139567976830786 (code B ref 17073); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2014 16:49:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS840-00080T-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:35454) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS83x-00080J-Ps for 17073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2Y00I0094DZV00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 17073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:52:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2Y00ANU9IVOO50@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:52:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87319 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 05:00:34 +0100 > Cc: 17073@debbugs.gnu.org, Glenn Morris , > Michael Heerdegen > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > The difference is between the file (a.k.a. "basename") part of the > > file name, and the leading directories part. And yes, it is true. > > Well, as I said, I think that docstring could benefit from a little love. Not sure which part needs love. Could you perhaps point out the unclear parts?