From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17497: 24.4.50; TTY menu glitches Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 23:21:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83r43teaou.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5374B271.50803@yandex.ru> <83zjijlz83.fsf@gnu.org> <8361l6m7md.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400271811 19124 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2014 20:23:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 20:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, 17497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 16 22:23:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOf0-0006ln-0D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 22:23:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOez-0007ZQ-Dm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOeq-0007O2-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOel-00051V-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOel-00051P-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOek-00069a-IO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 20:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17497.140027172323535 (code B ref 17497); Fri, 16 May 2014 20:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2014 20:22:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37690 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOdl-00067F-Qh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:64392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlOdi-00066n-L3 for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:21:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N5O00E00O537M00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 23:21:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N5O00DA4OKFPX90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 May 2014 23:21:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89175 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, 17497@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:47:27 -0400 > > > Does this happen if you use the menu "reasonably", i.e. without > > leaning on arrow keys? > > So far no, IME. Which means what? that the terminal somehow "optimizes out" some of the commands it receives when they arrive at a high rate??