From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18367: 24.4.50; [PATCH] Text property `font-lock-ignore', to protect from font-lock Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:04:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3zvf6pg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86f1a219-9ab5-439f-85ca-936b942cb034@default> <85mwajb2mx.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <83sikbf9bg.fsf@gnu.org> <85a96jazz0.fsf@iznogoud.viz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409601925 30555 80.91.229.3 (1 Sep 2014 20:05:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18367@debbugs.gnu.org To: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 01 22:05:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqm-0005j1-Sx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 22:05:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33785 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqm-0007MH-Fc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqe-0007K6-Md for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqZ-0006YG-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqZ-0006XS-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXqY-0004Wb-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18367 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18367-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18367.140960186917338 (code B ref 18367); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18367) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2014 20:04:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXq1-0004Va-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:49998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXpy-0004VJ-GK for 18367@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NB800300N7WUQ00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 18367@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:03:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NB8004K6NPC8C10@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:03:12 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <85a96jazz0.fsf@iznogoud.viz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92939 Archived-At: > From: Wolfgang Jenkner > Cc: 18367@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:43:31 +0200 > > > The "it" in that text alludes to font-lock-extra-managed-props, not to > > font-lock-face. > > I don't think the "it" is a problem here. > > > After all, the former is what is being documented in > > the text you cited; the latter is just mentioned because > > font-lock-face is another kind of specification of "additional" > > properties of interest to Font Lock. > > But, `font-lock-face' is of no interest to > font-lock-default-unfontify-region, the `face' property is. > > font-lock-default-unfontify-region does not remove the `font-lock-face' > property, it removes the `face' property. > > font-lock-default-unfontify-region does not "manage" the > `font-lock-face' property, it "manages" the `face' property. The cited text says that font-lock-default-unfontify-region uses font-lock-extra-managed-props. That is all it says; all the rest is just comments and references to related features .