From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18995: Error: Could not reserve dynamic heap area. Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:05:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3xdpiex.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834mu9r47v.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4rlpmsr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq75plkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbmppj4a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415477189 10422 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2014 20:06:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18995@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alexander Shukaev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 08 21:06:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCH5-0000vI-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:06:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCH5-0002o8-Df for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGv-0002gn-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGp-0002nN-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:06:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGp-0002nF-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGn-0005uK-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18995 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18995-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18995.141547715122688 (code B ref 18995); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18995) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2014 20:05:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGZ-0005tm-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XnCGU-0005tZ-FE for 18995@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:05:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NEQ00300KYUIN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 18995@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:05:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NEQ003ZXL5G0B80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:05:41 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95748 > Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:58:02 +0100 > From: Alexander Shukaev > Cc: 18995@debbugs.gnu.org > > Do you understand why -funroll-loops causes the code to fail to work? > > Because I cannot. Unless I'm missing something, this sounds like a > GCC bug. > > > I've no idea. For that we would have to look into generated assembly code, but > I'd rather leave that for compiler professionals to analyze. Would forward it > to GCC guys? It probably does warrant a GCC bug report. > And how about filtering this flag for good as I asked earlier? > > CFLAGS := $(filter-out -funroll-loops,$(CFLAGS)) What for? It's a perfectly legitimate compiler switch, and should work here as well, I think.