From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20614: Segmentation fault when building on Power8 Little Endian Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:43:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3lf9gq4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555C3E3C.4090700@redhat.com> <1gpp5vi5xn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <555DD5D3.3020207@redhat.com> <55A3A08A.9060905@redhat.com> <55A4BFB7.3010208@redhat.com> <55F95275.4040209@redhat.com> <56012AA6.7010702@redhat.com> <56025D9A.9080608@redhat.com> <838u7xlbsn.fsf@gnu.org> <56028633.3000303@redhat.com> <83zj0djskx.fsf@gnu.org> <56029707.9040100@redhat.com> <83wpvhjpdd.fsf@gnu.org> <5603D8BE.10300@redhat.com> <834mijkf36.fsf@gnu.org> <56043950.7040108@redhat.com> <83k2rdhaso.fsf@gnu.org> <560BBBF3.6000407@redhat.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443708667 22846 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 14:11:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20614@debbugs.gnu.org To: Petr Hracek Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 16:10:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheZT-0002Ta-5m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:10:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZheZI-00041e-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYY9-0008W8-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYY3-0006RL-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYY3-0006RC-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYY2-0005Cs-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:45:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20614 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20614-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20614.144368544419928 (code B ref 20614); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20614) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2015 07:44:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49857 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYX5-0005BM-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:40458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhYX4-0005Ap-6n for 20614@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVJ00B006KXYJ00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 20614@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:44:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVJ009FC6TR3F30@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:44:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <560BBBF3.6000407@redhat.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107132 Archived-At: > From: Petr Hracek > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:39:47 +0200 > Cc: 20614@debbugs.gnu.org > > My deep observation with emacs package and binutils: > 1) binutils-2.23.52.0.1-30.el7_1.2.ppc64le.rpm works completely. > 2) binutils-2.23.52.0.1-40.el7.ppc64le.rpm works if row > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/src/unexelf.c?h=emacs-24#n869 > is suppressed. > > With newer version of binutils I can see the same series:( > like: > Dumping under the name emacs > emacs: Program segment above .bss in > /builddir/build/BUILD/emacs-24.3/src/temacs > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/emacs-24.3/src' > make[2]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 1 > > I have collected list of commits and messages against upstream: > #1200138 > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=43a8475ca01b676fb764aaed0c4ed1cc16fc3c87 #1200138 > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=eec2f3ed9f053653ed5d629eb50e08e3ee61e9bd #1203449 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1003499 # 1175624 .opd > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-01/msg00227.html > # 1175624 .got which implies .sdata, .sbss, .plt .iplt and .branch_lt also have > to move: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-01/msg00228.html > # 1175624 And .toc1: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-01/msg00232.html > #1194164 func@localentry expressions, which was added to FSF binutils with git > commit 45965137 > #1183838 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=986213 > # 1172766 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=989450 I hope it helps > you a bit. I think we need help from someone who understands the Binutils part of this. Can you ask some of the Binutils maintainers please join this discussion and analyze the problem?