From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22114: 24.5; [PATCH] Allow profiler.el to display reports after stopping Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:12:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3iwbsyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bna0di5k.fsf@gnu.org> <20151208191523.GB19310@odonien.bevuta.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449605604 2228 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 20:13:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22114@debbugs.gnu.org, v.schneidermann@gmail.com To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 21:13:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdM-0000hU-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33346 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdK-0000T8-JK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdH-0000T2-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdC-0005qm-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdC-0005qe-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OdC-0007gu-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22114 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22114-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22114.144960554429508 (code B ref 22114); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22114) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2015 20:12:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OcZ-0007fr-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:57906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6OcY-0007fh-9W for 22114@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:12:22 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ200D002I1CH00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 22114@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:12:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ200DEH2SK5Z50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:12:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109800 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , John Wiegley , 22114@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:21:15 -0800 > > I would like to maintain UI consistency with well-established tools, since > this module is fairly new. How does that sound, Eli? I don't see any consistency issue here. But since I've already managed to irritate, I guess it's time for me to crawl back under my rock and let you decide.