From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:40:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3idq1db.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837fk6queu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450842023 20942 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2015 03:40:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22220@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ram Bhamidipaty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 23 04:40:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHc-0005tn-AZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 04:40:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHb-0007tq-NR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHV-0007tL-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHS-0002NB-EY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHS-0002N1-Bs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaHS-0004BJ-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22220 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22220-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22220.145084197516035 (code B ref 22220); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2015 03:39:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaH0-0004AZ-OV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaGz-0004AM-39 for 22220@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaGq-0001y0-Tx for 22220@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:39:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaGq-0001xk-JU; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1979 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aBaGp-0006my-Vr; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:39:24 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Ram Bhamidipaty on Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:25:28 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110297 Archived-At: > From: Ram Bhamidipaty > CC: "22220@debbugs.gnu.org" <22220@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:25:28 +0000 > > It would be nice if the default process sentinel were explicitly documented - at least the name and formal description. The description is what I cited from the manual; there's nothing else to be said about that, because that's all that the default sentinel does. As for the name, why is that important? You can always get it installed for the process using nil as the argument to set-process-sentinel, and the implementation is in C, so how would the name help?