From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19547: Patch for this bug Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:39:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83r35wzp95.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874ms03qj1.fsf@web.de> <8360nxhfiw.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2ccfnh8.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpgbdy82.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4071o5k.fsf@gmail.com> <83h96u3d07.fsf@gnu.org> <87zikl8leb.fsf@gmail.com> <871sxxj9s8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87twat6kjd.fsf@gmail.com> <834m2s2a0d.fsf@gnu.org> <87r35wx0qe.fsf@gmail.com> <83twaszrzk.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa10wxsh.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480275614 17686 195.159.176.226 (27 Nov 2016 19:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 19547@debbugs.gnu.org, rrt@sc3d.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 20:40:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5J0-0003Kl-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5J4-00073b-8z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Iw-00072E-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Iv-0004wg-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Iv-0004wa-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:40:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Iv-0008NE-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19547 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19547-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19547.148027558532161 (code B ref 19547); Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2016 19:39:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Ie-0008Me-NV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37560) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5Ic-0008MR-G2 for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:39:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5IW-0004oz-GC for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:39:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5IR-0004oP-P4; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1846 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cB5IP-0001UU-9M; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:39:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <87oa10wxsh.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Thierry Volpiatto on Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:03:10 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126184 Archived-At: > From: Thierry Volpiatto > Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 19547@debbugs.gnu.org, rrt@sc3d.org > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 20:03:10 +0100 > > > Why not? You will see quite a few examples of such stuff there. > > Ok no problem, 2 last questions: > > - What about like suggested by Noam to put this just above the > definition of while-no-input in subr.el ? No objections here. > - IIRC you didn't want to add by default selection-request aka > SELECTION_REQUEST_EVENT, is this always true ? I had no firm opinion on that. However, since it will be so easy to add and remove events to/from the list, I see no problem in having SELECTION_REQUEST_EVENT there by default: an application that doesn't want that can easily have what it wants.