From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26952: 25.1; loops eating all memory while yanking big rectangle Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:10:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2zinqbb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zie8gyu4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h90fq269.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaovh1db.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360gvpfxr.fsf@gnu.org> <87shjzgwgk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y3tqnsab.fsf@gnu.org> <877f1agpz3.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495383139 12989 195.159.176.226 (21 May 2017 16:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 26952@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 21 18:12:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSm-0003C4-7G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 18:12:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38667 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSr-0006qI-M6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSh-0006id-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:12:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSd-0007mI-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSc-0007mA-U5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTSc-0003l7-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26952 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26952-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26952.149538307914388 (code B ref 26952); Sun, 21 May 2017 16:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26952) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 May 2017 16:11:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59498 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTRv-0003k0-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43423) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTRs-0003jm-Vx for 26952@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTRm-0007aR-Uz for 26952@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTRg-0007YK-Dk; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3733 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTRf-00084X-HK; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:11:03 -0400 In-reply-to: <877f1agpz3.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132701 Archived-At: > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: Paul Eggert , 26952@debbugs.gnu.org, pot@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 12:00:00 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I cannot see why. AFAIK, the only difference between using the hybrid > > allocation and not using it is before Emacs is dumped; after that both > > use the same system malloc. > > I was under the impression that it's just the opposite: master is using > hybrid malloc which means to use system malloc *after* dumping, and > emacs-25 is using the custom non-system malloc *after* dumping. By "custom non-system malloc" do you mean gmalloc.c? Is there src/gmalloc.o in the build directory? (I don't have access to a system when this happens, my GNU/Linux build doesn't have src/gmalloc.o.) Does enlarge_buffer_text eventually calls into gmalloc.c in the problematic build? I thought we moved to system malloc in Emacs 25.2, and that was my reading of configure, but maybe I'm confused.