From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34639: 26.1; Custom themes break terminal when switching to org-mode Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 08:59:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83r2bphidl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877edpnks4.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83lg25nizp.fsf@gnu.org> <874l8t10t3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83a7ilngql.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3x0zfz.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <835zt9ng24.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvgtget3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834l8tnf4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o971hskf.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8336odnen2.fsf@gnu.org> <87va19dkaw.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <831s3wo87r.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3vofu9.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87imx71vuc.fsf@tcd.ie> <83h8crmdan.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7ihkx77.fsf@gnu.org> <83mumfkee9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="14116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, kisik21@fireburn.ru, 34639@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 02 08:00:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzyd2-0003ag-Gv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 08:00:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzyd1-00070I-GL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzycv-00070B-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzyct-00069P-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzyct-00065o-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzycs-0000Kc-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 07:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34639.15515099751213 (code B ref 34639); Sat, 02 Mar 2019 07:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2019 06:59:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzycQ-0000JT-UG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzycP-0000JF-3H for 34639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzycJ-0005IG-7D; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3369 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gzyc5-0006rp-N5; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:59:15 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 01 Mar 2019 22:28:27 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155943 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, kisik21@fireburn.ru, 34639@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 22:28:27 -0500 > > Why is it better if people use the display margins via > linum (not core) rather than by an option in native line numbers? > I don't see that it makes much difference to the issues of > future maintenance. It makes a difference because we can tell them to drop linum if they have problems with display margins. And because we don't have to deal with bug reports about such conflicts. > What happens if two features try to use the display margins? You have a mess in the display margin area. Even the size of the margin can change unpredictably, because each feature changes it according to its own logic. > What does the interference look like? I suppose they can't both work > properly, but does it cause anything worse than that? What can be worse in a real-time editor than a messed-up display?