From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20150: 24.4: bookmarks: return from editing annotations (FIX INCLUDED) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:30:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83r26u1jeu.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="189165"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 20150@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 13 09:31:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUt-000mz8-N4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:31:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54030 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUs-0006By-KS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUp-0006Br-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUo-0004JL-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUo-0004J8-MQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCUo-0004HW-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 20150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20150.156300301416349 (code B ref 20150); Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2019 07:30:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCU1-0004Fa-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCTz-0004FK-DA for 20150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCTt-0003HR-Vg; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2954 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hmCTt-0005DG-4P; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:30:05 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:40:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162852 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:40:45 +0200 > Cc: 20150@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've attached an updated patch without this FIXME. Other than that, > it's identical. Thanks. > +(define-obsolete-variable-alias 'bookmark-annotation-name > + 'bookmark-annotation--name "27.1") Hmm... we declare a non-internal variable obsolete and replace it with an internal variable? Why is that a good idea? Does the new variable have to be internal?