From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43865: mml-attach-file could call system file chooser Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 15:55:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1q87u8l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d01t0wlk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83wo016i9v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43865@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 08 14:56:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVSt-0000Nn-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 14:56:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVSs-0002va-PK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVSl-0002v9-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVSk-0001oP-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVSk-0004af-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43865.160216170817567 (code B ref 43865); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 12:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2020 12:55:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVRs-0004ZG-6m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVRp-0004Yl-Rq for 43865@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVRk-0001Wk-9H; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1976 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVRj-000393-KD; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 08:54:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 08 Oct 2020 14:28:16 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190088 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson , > 43865@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 14:28:16 +0200 > > True, but I think this was more of a feature request. How about we > allow use-dialog-box and use-file-dialog to have a value of 'always? Does that really work? Doesn't the mouse click even bring some information needed by the dialog? I guess it's okay if not, although I wouldn't be building such a new feature on a single request. But that's me.