From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44316: 26.3; Faces `fixed-pitch' and `fixed-pitch-serif' are opposite what they should be Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:27:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1pdf67c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56375b2e-74c4-4218-a344-500d31dd3c75@default> <87d00zj2jm.fsf@gnus.org> <877dr7hlkf.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1pehj7l.fsf@gnu.org> <87blghdzb9.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19438"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44316@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 01 16:28:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFH7-0004xT-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 16:28:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFH6-0007I3-Eg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFH0-0007Hl-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGz-0007Wl-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGz-00065q-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44316 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44316-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44316.160424445923395 (code B ref 44316); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44316) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2020 15:27:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGd-00065G-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:27:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGb-000652-UW for 44316@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGW-0007Tf-Jm; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3118 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZFGU-0005Yz-Tv; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:27:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87blghdzb9.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 01 Nov 2020 13:41:30 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192402 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 44316@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 13:41:30 +0100 > > > The other part of the problem, which could be Windows-specific, is > > that the MS-Windows font back-ends don't know about "Mono Serif" > > family. Do you always get a font with serifs when the family is "Mono > > Serif"? If so, we could perhaps teach MS-Windows do the same. But > > the result might be that both faces get the same font -- are we okay > > with that? One place where that could matter is in Info. > > It looks like DejaVu Mono only has one variation, and it's... with > serifs? No, it's without serifs, AFAICS. But that's not what I was asking: the "Mono Serif" family could include more than just DejaVu Mono. I'm asking whether asking for that family always brings fonts with serifs, or sometimes you get fonts without serifs? If you get DejaVu Mono, I guess the answer is "the latter"?