From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31350: 27.0; `pcase' message: "Redundant pcase pattern" Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1nuetn6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86d352f4-5fa7-4bee-b72c-17e58aace43f@default> <87364hs46h.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgaudiss.fsf@web.de> <8bcc3be5-c9db-4015-8f0f-4efe77ff27ee@default> <87sgau93fh.fsf@web.de> <87v9fqrsvf.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh2j2m44.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, larsi@gnus.org, 31350@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 12 21:57:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1koBwy-00016c-5h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:57:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56858 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koBwx-0004Fg-6Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koA9b-00064y-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koA9Z-0001dj-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koA9Z-0003Vp-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31350 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 31350-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31350.160779968413450 (code B ref 31350); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31350) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2020 19:01:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koA8y-0003Us-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koA8x-0003Uh-I9 for 31350@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koA8r-0001Qk-Jw; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:01:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4917 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1koA8p-000125-SE; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:01:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:00:34 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195895 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:00:34 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 31350@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I've now done this in Emacs 28, and I'm closing this bug report. There > > was some talk about changing this warning in other ways, and if that's > > something people want to pursue, opening a new bug report for that would > > be fine. > > I can't tell just what was fixed and what might not > have been You certainly can, if you look at the changes committed by Lars. I've shown the URL for doing that several times in the past.