From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45806: 26.3; `menu-bar-separator' Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:22:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1mqc8xg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<73e90890-b70a-4eb8-aa9e-d40959d1e1ec@default>> <<83pn2adwn1.fsf@gnu.org>> <4313a39b-5d20-4fff-ab14-fb9be0a43a78@default> <835z42dr4j.fsf@gnu.org> <8ba18d55-3484-4186-b8c2-0335cd8b7b7c@default> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45806@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 19:47:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOh4-00021R-6F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:47:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOh3-0003mS-7X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOJq-00031B-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOJp-0002hL-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOJp-000333-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45806 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45806-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45806.161047572211630 (code B ref 45806); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2021 18:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOIq-00031N-Dw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOIo-000319-Ch for 45806@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOIj-0002GM-1B; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2379 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOIe-0006My-Jx; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:21:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8ba18d55-3484-4186-b8c2-0335cd8b7b7c@default> (message from Drew Adams on Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:09:08 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197830 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:09:08 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 45806-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Why am I not surprised that you don't accept the judgment of the > > project maintainers? > > Why am I not surprised that you are personally > hostile, and interpret an opinion as non-acceptance > of a decision? You expressed your opinion, heard is rejection, and you keep arguing. Are you aware that every one of your messages with repetitive disagreements means another message I need to read and consider? Do you think I have lots of free time for doing that? > Can we not politely agree to disagree about what > should be done We can, but one message from each side should be enough for that. There should be no need for "I heard you, but I still disagree". It's a waste of time and energy.