From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45143: Incorrect markup in some doc/misc manuals Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 22:11:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1l9w58u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3y4kku7u8d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <3pft2gpyn5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <0nmtw32qvz.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45143@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 21:16:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv9N-0000oL-3G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 21:16:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv9M-0007Xj-1f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv6F-0005cG-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv6E-0003ey-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv6E-0005F5-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45143 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45143-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45143.161393832220070 (code B ref 45143); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2021 20:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54914 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv5F-0005Da-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv5A-0005DK-QE for 45143@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv55-0003BY-LP for 45143@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2395 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDv4w-0006Ab-Fr; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 15:11:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 21 Feb 2021 01:15:25 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200525 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 01:15:25 -0500 > Cc: 45143@debbugs.gnu.org > > Theis problem is in doc/misc/modus-themes.texi, > but I suspect that doc/misc/org.texi has it too. > > The problem is that the file uses the wrong Texinfo markup in some > places. I suspect that the source markup language, from which this > Texinfo text is generated, doesn't have the ability to make all the > distinctions Texinfo needs. I think this is because Org has some problems in supporting some of the key Texinfo markups, such as @kbd. This was discussed 3 years ago, in this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-03/msg00166.html I don't know if Org's support for Texinfo became better since then.