From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1kpsrng.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x6u9o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzesrku.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40779"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 08 14:28:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFvv-000AVU-06 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFvu-0003FS-1e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:28:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFub-0002dW-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFuY-0007Uo-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFuY-0001Zv-CU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.16152100046038 (code B ref 46256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2021 13:26:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFuG-0001ZK-1V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:26:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFuE-0001Z6-KR for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFu9-0007N8-At; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:26:37 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3771 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lJFu8-0005Fp-8Z; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:26:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:16:58 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201827 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:16:58 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com > > > >> This object might have been GC'ed for some reason and we might be > > >> looking at the same GC issue I've seen on 32bit wide-int (my guess). > > >> *If* this is the case the question is: why is the CU GC'ed? > > > > > > Why wouldn't it be? I'm trying to follow along here :-) > > > > If the CU was GC'ed the eln should have been dlclosed. > > Wait, I thought this was on Windows? Yes, and...? > > If that's the > > case at the next load we should get a fresh handle > > You're assuming > 1. FreeLibrary() succeeded > 2. The module's refcount was 1 > 3. The module wasn't pinned. > > If any of these assumptions is violated, the behavior would be > precisely as observed. Why would any of the above assumptions be violated?