From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] fix VC to find the responsible backend with the most specific path. Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:22:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1dqaxs1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877dfkxyt4.fsf@elite.giraud> <83y280cv8g.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtofvbnl.fsf@elite.giraud> <83h7encrq1.fsf@gnu.org> <143cbf9a-ff56-150a-6610-bfa9f2c05600@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50572@debbugs.gnu.org, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 13:23:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT0U-00087U-M6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:23:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51106 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT0T-0007gL-JH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT0I-0007g6-Dg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT0H-0005Ue-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT0H-00057U-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50572.163170496719640 (code B ref 50572); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2021 11:22:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51001 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT03-00056h-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQT02-00056W-SM for 50572@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQSzx-0005Gq-9w; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:22:41 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1060 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQSzw-0008MT-LF; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:22:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <143cbf9a-ff56-150a-6610-bfa9f2c05600@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:41:57 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214386 Archived-At: > Cc: 50572@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:41:57 +0300 > > Now, the change in vc-responsible-backend might seem controversial, as > it decreases customizability and performance (a bit), but it was made a > year ago, and we've received no substantial complaints. And there have > been multiple reports (all linked) about the previous behavior. That doesn't alleviate my worries, unfortunately. Many people either don't use VC or use it very "narrowly", so they never bump into these rarely-used-but-very-useful features.