From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50009: 28.0.50; add CRLF to outgoing ERC protocol logger lines Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:24:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1dn90sz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v94chxbh.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czpb4ilx.fsf@neverwas.me> <87v9335te6.fsf@dick> <87lf3y7pic.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf3xpzkb.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, bandali@gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com, jp@neverwas.me To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 17 08:26:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Kb-0009rt-R5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:26:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Ka-0007Ra-CQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jz-0007R8-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jy-0007Qr-RY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jy-0007AS-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50009 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50009-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50009.163185995427539 (code B ref 50009); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50009) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2021 06:25:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jq-0007A6-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jm-00079r-OI for 50009@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Jg-0007Bz-3c; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4709 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mR7Iz-0006i4-SS; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:25:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 16 Sep 2021 20:13:56 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214524 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 20:13:56 -0400 > Cc: 50009@debbugs.gnu.org, bandali@gnu.org, jp@neverwas.me > > Can a PR-based workflow be made to operate via email, in a way that > doesn't require a net connection? (Except, at some later time, for > committing a change.) That is a requisite for us. As I said, we should NOT discuss these matters in an unrelated bug report. Our prerequisite is not to have the PR workflow work via email, it is that the maintainer's part of the workflow could be done via email.