From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7786: 23.2; Encoding of PostScript files Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:45:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1cona9v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ee8p58y3.fsf@gnus.org> <835yu1nd9j.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfx452rw.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuhknbk2.fsf@gnu.org> <87o87s5225.fsf@gnus.org> <0FA98FF5-733D-4846-89EF-22ED9F6C2E58@Freenet.DE> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23482"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 7786@debbugs.gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 18:48:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mahQs-0005qf-8v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:48:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mahQr-0002mJ-9h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mahPD-00019t-Oe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mahPC-0005du-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mahPC-0006br-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7786 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 7786-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7786.163414356625342 (code B ref 7786); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7786) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2021 16:46:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mahOI-0006af-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mahOG-0006ZW-17 for 7786@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mahOA-0004lW-Ft; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3604 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mahOA-0006mo-2s; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:45:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0FA98FF5-733D-4846-89EF-22ED9F6C2E58@Freenet.DE> (message from Peter Dyballa on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:23:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:217150 Archived-At: > From: Peter Dyballa > Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:23:50 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > 7786@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostScript_Latin_1_Encoding > >> > >> It shows the Unicode codepoint for each character in the codepage. Or > >> what am I missing? > > > > Yes, that's what I suggested using as the source -- somebody would have > > to transcribe that into a machine readable file. > > Is this OK and usable? AFAICT, that's very different from the Wikipedia data.