From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52587: 29.0.50; Wrong block header/footer background in Org Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1a719xw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl1cx21k.fsf@gnus.org> <8735moyev6.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7b491x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsqnvl98.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11864"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, salutis@me.com, 52587@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 20:22:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzOFA-0002rM-P2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:22:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34186 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzOF9-0006fi-NB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM9n-0002V4-6u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM9m-0000Cr-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM9l-0006Nj-U2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52587 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 52587-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52587.164002008824453 (code B ref 52587); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2021 17:08:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM8u-0006ML-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM8q-0006Lk-2l for 52587@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=46214 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM8k-00004z-MD; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:07:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=pHP9lVTounoIh5howmlhXufrXCqIk6ySRl4aqzKMOw4=; b=GIXy7YYEOHVh+flg8rsd Rf175zSQq5eilh4yT8J/ButWE+IW2N9jnjhEqNO5LL3D28rTa/VReRLzlhDgPtI/x6j8UyDGWpppu pWNLVo69acC+4QyLF/vMMrgUMgPhdJ7YqIP3I9a+6y5/Z3GpdXh976nRKek/bDtyW4FtI303CRwNw Hs3QXk1ZNbKZgI6YC4dOjSul+lMMDnpLhJjCQ5j6/cDEf3nszO/V7lklgy4rj5CcW8pXPN8r7Cx/F 9RZ3I16H2KDz0oRtxypsDdRTXwwouanSMb9HMz9ofW/9ehN8F06jubfgXzGhV+GmAQx5oKKdAim3d 8GKbWzshz1Ewxw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1718 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzM8k-00067U-Af; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:07:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fsqnvl98.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec on Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:33:07 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222805 Archived-At: > From: Kévin Le Gouguec > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, salutis@me.com, 52587@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:33:07 +0100 > > But I think this bug report shows that some users have different > expectations, rooted in an abstract sense of what is and is not "part" > of the subsection to hide. Specifically, they consider that the > end-of-line decoration of a subsection's last line is "part" of the > subsection, and so expect it to be hidden when the subsection is folded. Which means the Lisp code which defines which parts are hidden should hide slightly different parts? Because the display engine does its job perfectly here, and so do the faces: they do what you tell them to do. IOW, while I see your point, I don't think I understand how would you like this to be resolved.