From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50951: 28.0.50; Urdu text is not displayed correctly Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:55:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83r10qj57g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mtnsc63i.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfxjbox7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmsnwlvo.fsf@igel.home> <837devbgrl.fsf@gnu.org> <8335pjbewj.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgrr9zn1.fsf@gnu.org> <87edwq7srx.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <87y1uy6mn5.fsf@zohomail.eu> <83wnaij974.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu5m6jrw.fsf@zohomail.eu> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9368"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50951@debbugs.gnu.org To: Rah Guzar Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 05 15:57:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCbG-0002Fg-3h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:57:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCbF-0005h3-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCb1-0005gr-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCb0-0003eq-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCb0-0003tL-BB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 50951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50951.166238618014921 (code B ref 50951); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 13:56:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48537 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCaK-0003sb-6n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:56:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43332) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCaI-0003sV-IV for 50951@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCaC-0003bt-TU; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:56:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uWA+RNSiPpwcH1mrfxigv/afpl53PNso0rLdvbYLX/o=; b=h5ECko5Y/Ps3 ShRsUtOxu7AwozB7ROXqT8tZVArqpB256vUhpSn6YGaxEtQhcpGpmYMTHYbo8EFxJUVNilKAkXWua 8Bkqnn19fT/AskPdTfu8AlpHov1MZ9vd1gtRP8lbDJ75OIbwqwTPUyP3Yy3l17R17dLb/iXZnR1/a Ju6oIxup1KK1Fo+RWvjQN4r96zJ1O7xDLUjgU8vNkimD8ihMdiEDiO+u9YwC1FFCFHlQ8J9SCxwne OK+Ya4z6C2KxRTbBlBvFefG2JzOhEXrf5LDqiJNDRl7xEYZT2thUwLVd32ZZIYAWhX1c9iopMjob2 4FfOAV8yFbBkCqVn/iZigw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3449 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVCa9-0004oC-SR; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:56:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tu5m6jrw.fsf@zohomail.eu> (message from Rah Guzar on Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:03:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241567 Archived-At: > From: Rah Guzar > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50951@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:03:47 +0200 > > > My conclusion from this is that Noto Nastaliq is not a good font for > > Urdu. > > On an aesthetic level, I tend to agree. But linux distributions package > very few Urdu fonts and it tends to be one of the few. FWIW, on my system I cannot convince Emacs to use Noto Nastaliq Urdu font for Urdu. I have no idea what's going on here, sorry.