From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58070: [PATCH] Add tamil99 input method Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:25:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83r0zxjpuu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20220925100020.13229-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20220925100244.13482-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87h70vsmyd.fsf@gmail.com> <8335cfmu5h.fsf@gnu.org> <87leq7r163.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1u7leh9.fsf@gnu.org> <87edvzr02i.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8pbla96.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsgdonru.fsf@systemreboot.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32579"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58070@debbugs.gnu.org, visuweshm@gmail.com To: Arun Isaac Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 08:36:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1od4Cn-0008ID-Fa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 08:36:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od4Cm-0008IZ-53 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od43b-00029x-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od43a-0000c3-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od43a-0007Va-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58070 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58070-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58070.166425996728797 (code B ref 58070); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58070) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2022 06:26:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od42g-0007UP-LI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od42Q-0007Te-3P for 58070@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od42J-0000WC-OC; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:25:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=DqzG1+yQxG+SGQbY8AzHCikv9BwXrSjav3y1u78FzBU=; b=PLr0OznuckZS DOiV6AKoKIN9s5erUHwODIMrB/NvX634UFB7D0DM6yhieQL9+DM4mCvmFPjnehzLW3Y9jzixbyk+O zyPPzyzIc/zG6XoUB1JX93IyE3/gDUNOoUZ3Zts9mOqU6o5jMrbyqnCX1FSWHNujxS/1cM5siHiwY m8OyEvWfNMqRlC/aTSoU7zI1sKPMeqil20pe4NMPFbwwRG3fHfrI0FExqYdXumdcY88NaM79p1RPT nAsEmrXpKu+8w9L232rp7nF/xl6mX7tqnalFjdctP/QO1goBE5emgZhwS14tG6iBdiovMy9lDKEiw L/bNoJCEv4cZm/RhvQ0czA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1401 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od42C-0002TA-HG; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:25:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fsgdonru.fsf@systemreboot.net> (message from Arun Isaac on Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:29:17 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243692 Archived-At: > From: Arun Isaac > Cc: 58070@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:29:17 +0530 > > I do agree with Visuwesh that we should not offer two separate input > methods---one for each implementation. Our code is but two different > implementations of *exactly* the same input method. The differences in > behaviour are far too subtle and would only confuse the user. I thought they assumed different keyboard layout? Anyway, even for the same layout, it is not unthinkable to have several input methods, we already have that for other scripts. For example, if they offer distinct features that some users could want, but at the price of some additional complexity of input sequences.