From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58318: 28.2; Emacs installed from package won't work with MinGW Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:03:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83r0zjn31y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835ygxsdyu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zge9w049.fsf@gnus.org> <83k05dovwq.fsf@gnu.org> <87a667x3l4.fsf@gnus.org> <83edvjondh.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfjzvnyu.fsf@gnus.org> <837d1bomsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn9bn69q.fsf@gnu.org> <83tu4fn3rz.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="750"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, corwin@bru.st, 58318@debbugs.gnu.org, bartosz.bubak@gmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 17:17:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogp6X-000AWH-FZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:17:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54528 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogp6W-0005Dv-Az for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:17:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ognyI-0003xl-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ognyI-0001Gz-Hw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ognyI-0003hs-DI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58318 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58318-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58318.166515144414176 (code B ref 58318); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2022 14:04:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ognxM-0003ga-95 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35756) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ognxJ-0003fi-Ik for 58318@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ognxE-0001BG-8V; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:03:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=FXKHtCLe91UgSguLwgIPWDeO9n8EEB9Jtr/rNMf167I=; b=Y8tQiLCCkXHF lPliR2492G8wTc3YIYZ9RenWAGH8GU6pQygUgX+3k91jddTZgH2CvZ0bW2NNE0irasYzCelshexrE kBZ0fvJW+Fl1OZfWIEhayHCSXSwIK6eaFR1bHPIZ4SQoaDGGnB7bfek44BJi/Jm/w4kj3vbs88Svz fnYjL99j+t6JBrCB7jcHgL+AD60xz46DIkjJy8YpVL8hHFSaP0C2Mtw6guNZud4nRCFl4MWLZ5Fw8 5Yw3DyU3xTMj9Lvx1N+jPp7RsqWJ/emygqdJSQ5bgXlmXkEgzUv6AeBN9/eSAS+CIXj3gfOCvAeiN vUYTxkPTy+8/0h3+zAnfzA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3162 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ognxD-0005xi-Kl; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:03:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:54:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244817 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, corwin@bru.st, bartosz.bubak@gmail.com, > 58318@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:54:05 +0000 > > > How much will performance suffer if we use funcall? > > This is the usual 1 milion dollar question, we can run benchmarks but we > are never sure of how much realistic they are. That said IME this is > one of the most effective optimizations we have, funcall is a non > trivial and relatively slow machine when executed at each function > activation. OK, then let's go for precompiling all the trampolines AOT.