From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Cc: 67862-done@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ohler@gnu.org
Subject: bug#67862: 30.0.50; Handler-bind and ert-test-error-debug
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 14:15:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83r0j11c8f.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2o7e5bnqb.fsf@Pro.fritz.box> (message from Gerd Möllmann on Mon, 01 Jan 2024 06:56:44 +0100)
> Cc: 67862-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Christian Ohler <ohler@gnu.org>
> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 06:56:44 +0100
>
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
> > My conclusion is that the three tests that are broken by the use of
> > `handler-bind` are "bad" tests in the sense that they tested for
> > a behavior which corresponds to a failure of ERT (they verified that
> > ERT's error-tracing infrastructure is rendered inoperable by
> > a surrounding `condition-case`, which amounts to saying that ERT was not
> > working correctly when called within a `condition-case`).
>
> That makes sense, yes.
I wonder why should we leave these tests in the files, instead of
removing them? What purpose does that serve?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-01 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-17 0:37 bug#67862: 30.0.50; Handler-bind and ert-test-error-debug Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-17 6:53 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-12-17 15:08 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-26 16:25 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-12-26 18:00 ` Gerd Möllmann
2023-12-31 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-01-01 5:56 ` Gerd Möllmann
2024-01-01 12:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2024-01-01 16:43 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-02-01 22:27 ` J.P.
2024-02-02 2:46 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-02-02 23:28 ` J.P.
2024-02-02 23:44 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83r0j11c8f.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=67862-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=ohler@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).