From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6715: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Cygwin build should use pre-crt0.c Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:26:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83pqyc8w49.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4C4A1B69.2050100@cornell.edu> <4C4ADB10.4030204@cornell.edu> <4C4B358A.6070009@cornell.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280004297 17956 80.91.229.12 (24 Jul 2010 20:44:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@gnu.org, 6715@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 24 22:44:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclZN-0001ea-93 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:44:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OclV0-0008Hs-Oa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44044 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OclUe-00086h-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclTN-0003Vn-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclTN-0003Vj-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclJG-0000vn-4u; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6715 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6715-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6715.12800031843572 (code B ref 6715); Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2010 20:26:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclIe-0000vZ-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OclIc-0000vU-81 for 6715@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:26:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6200900WF9F500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 6715@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:26:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.61.30]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L62004KXWRRI0F0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:26:22 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4C4B358A.6070009@cornell.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:27:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38877 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:48:42 -0400 > From: Ken Brown > Cc: "6715@debbugs.gnu.org" <6715@debbugs.gnu.org> > > I didn't regenerate configure. I wasn't sure if I should do that or > not. Yes, you should. But please make sure you do that with the same version of Autoconf that was used to generate the current one. Also, when src/config.in is affected as well (not in this case, I think), it, too, should be regenerated. Thanks.