From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13159: 24.3.50; `find-file-noselect' should not display or log messages Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83pq2dooak.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355419696 3925 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2012 17:28:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13159@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 13 18:28:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCaB-0003YZ-HW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCZy-0000VW-L0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCZu-0000S0-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCZt-0004AI-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCZt-0004AC-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCak-0006Ml-7K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13159 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13159-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13159.135541971224407 (code B ref 13159); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2012 17:28:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCaG-0006LZ-9q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:50312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjCaD-0006LR-JS for 13159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEZ00E00CHG6V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEZ00ETFCHX4A20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68468 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:46:07 -0800 > > I'm using `find-file-noselect', and I see this in *Messages*: > > Note: file is write protected > > First, that is not helpful at all, without saying WHICH file is > write-protected. > > More importantly, why does it make sense to display or record > such a message when the file is not visited interactively? If you invoke this function non-interactively, pass it a non-nil value as the 2nd argument. That should shut up any messages from this function or the subroutines it calls. E.g.: (find-file-noselect "/foo/bar/nonexistent-file" t) => # and no messages. Does this solve your problem?