From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppppb18u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6e5659a6-23f6-435a-847d-fbd4c611fcba@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385350693 23927 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2013 03:38:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 25 04:38:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkn05-0005gw-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:38:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkn04-0004J0-Ts for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:38:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmzx-0004Is-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmzr-0004aK-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:38:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmzr-0004aG-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmzr-0005lR-9H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:38:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15962 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15962-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15962.138535063922093 (code B ref 15962); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 03:37:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmz9-0005kH-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmz6-0005jo-KG for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWS00800V3O5D00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:37:09 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWS0079WVDXZX90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:37:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <6e5659a6-23f6-435a-847d-fbd4c611fcba@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80937 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:27:21 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This is another duplicate of 15008. > > The backtrace looks bogus, btw: > ... > > Not sure what you mean by that. Line 161 in w32menu.c is this: void x_activate_menubar (struct frame *f) { <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< set_frame_menubar (f, 0, 1); Line 451 in emacs.c is this: #else /* !WINDOWSNT */ #endif name = Fexpand_file_name (Vinvocation_name, dir); <<<<<<<<<<< while (1) { and it does not call anything in w32menu.c. Etc. and etc.: this simply cannot be a valid sequence of call-stack frames.