From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18438: 24.4.50; assertion failed in bidi.c Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:33:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83ppev4ouy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4745242cd3e424a6c4d5db0e8d3e33d0@amuri.net> <54109EB5.2060801@amuri.net> <8338bz9tt7.fsf@gnu.org> <153d642db591b29dba44712b44194385@amuri.net> <8361gt8jjz.fsf@gnu.org> <8338bx8enz.fsf@gnu.org> <47b6853869d32221142fecc7dff1d3e8@amuri.net> <83sijs46yu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410878072 19788 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2014 14:34:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18438@debbugs.gnu.org To: aidalgol@amuri.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 16:34:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpm-0007zg-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:34:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpm-0003L3-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpc-00038T-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpV-00089G-E6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpV-00088C-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtpR-0001pZ-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18438.14108779976978 (code B ref 18438); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2014 14:33:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtoj-0001oT-A3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:54002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTtog-0001oJ-4q for 18438@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:33:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NC000F000AJIA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 18438@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:33:11 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NC000E0J0FBVPC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:33:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93406 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:59:32 +1200 > From: aidalgol@amuri.net > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > > > The only reason I could think of for such assertion violations is > > some asynchronously run code that doesn't properly restore > > registers. Which is pretty far-fetched, but what else can explain > > this? > > I still have this session open, by the way. Do you want anything more > out of it? If you don't mind messing with assembler, it would be interesting to disassemble bidi_check_type, see in which register it holds the value when it tests it, and then look at the actual value in that register in the bidi_check_type's call-stack frame. TIA