From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18745: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 22:10:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83pozwyv6m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83611s3z0j.fsf@gnu.org> <83twpb2d8z.fsf@gnu.org> <834mh93az4.fsf@gnu.org> <83vb9oz9rs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446235883 13964 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2015 20:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18745@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 30 21:11:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG11-0005BI-5q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG10-0000ik-IF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG0w-0000gw-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG0s-0003XC-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG0s-0003X6-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG0s-0001v9-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18745.14462358297339 (code B ref 18745); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2015 20:10:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46532 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsG0K-0001uJ-HP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:37027) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsFzy-0001tp-Tk for 18745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NX100L00U8RN100@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 18745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 22:03:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NX100AIVUE0Q4A0@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 22:03:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108206 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:09:38 +0100 > Cc: 18745@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't think there's anything more to do here, other than perhaps adding a > note somewhere that the test doesn't work under TCC. If the batch says cmd /c echo arg1 = %1, arg2 = %2 i.e. invokes cmd.exe from the batch file, does the test still fail? If it still fails, I think making the test more tolerant of the trailing whitespace is IMO a better alternative than letting it fail. After all, that trailing space is not what we are testing there.