From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21824: 25.0.50; overlay modification-hooks called with wrong buffer Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:37:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83poznqguu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83611hvl0w.fsf@gnu.org> <8337wktols.fsf@gnu.org> <83twozqhhe.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446824303 14585 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 15:38:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21824@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 16:38:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5g-0004Gl-MV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:38:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5g-00011Z-81 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:38:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5Z-0000xf-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5W-00032m-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:38:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5W-00032h-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5W-0007uO-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21824 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 21824-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21824.144682426530377 (code B ref 21824); Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2015 15:37:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj5F-0007ts-7S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:56653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuj4u-0007tD-PV for 21824@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:37:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXE00700GFF9600@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 21824@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:40:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXE0085NGVWJS00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:40:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83twozqhhe.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108499 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:23:41 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 21824@debbugs.gnu.org > > I will see about adding a test for this tricky failure. Actually, would you like converting your test case into a test, and post a patch to the test suite to that effect? TIA.