From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34516: Multi-monitor frame sets Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:48:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83pnrpjb44.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="209409"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34516@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 17:50:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7U-000sKg-SG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7T-0007GF-Sf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7J-0007Fs-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7I-0004IC-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7I-0004I5-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm7F-0007LS-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:50:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34516 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34516-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34516.155050854528166 (code B ref 34516); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2019 16:49:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm6L-0007KD-98 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm6H-0007Jj-Ul for 34516@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm6C-0003pc-Aq; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1105 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gvm6B-0002am-A6; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:48:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:34:19 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155497 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:34:19 +0200 > > Shouldn't frame.el provide a command like make-frame-on-display, > but to make a frame on the specified monitor instead of display? > > Isn't the following patch the right way to do this? > (It also adds completion for the existing command): What kind of list does display-monitor-attributes-list return on your system, and how can you tell which part there refers to what physical monitor?