From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37495: 27.0.50; lwindow doesn't pass to system Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:39:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnjpodhp.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="182464"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37495@debbugs.gnu.org, georgealbert@qq.com To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 24 18:54:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCo5M-000lMF-3R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:54:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCo5K-000766-2C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:54:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnr9-0002Ux-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnr8-0003rH-W8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnr8-0003qn-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnr8-0004tx-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37495.156934318918814 (code B ref 37495); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2019 16:39:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnqv-0004tN-01 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnqs-0004t8-R3 for 37495@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnqd-0003WP-Jb; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4418 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iCnqb-0000Kd-Mv; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:39:31 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:50:35 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167100 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:50:35 +0200 > Cc: 37495 <37495@debbugs.gnu.org> > > I see two problems in your image, but none of them are related to being unable to redefine lwindow. I thought the OP said that lwindow doesn't work for him _without_ redefining it. IOW, the default action of the key is somehow intercepted by Emacs when it shouldn't be. Am I confused?