From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10483: [PATCH] cperl-mode: Avoid endless loop Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:36:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83pn71u635.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o8mqwwx2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0xewszf.fsf@gnu.org> <922046dc-34fa-487d-4695-6597f8db148e@posteo.de> <87k0xafcx2.fsf@gnus.org> <831rjiui58.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfhpddsf.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfhpbys4.fsf@igel.home> <87h7sddd4z.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18586"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 10483@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, haj@posteo.de To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 04 13:37:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1l-0004jk-Ch for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:37:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1k-0007RG-Go for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1e-0007Qq-8z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1d-0004aX-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1d-0006en-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10483 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 10483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10483.159921939225553 (code B ref 10483); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 11:36:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA1A-0006e5-Eb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA18-0006dt-Me for 10483@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA13-0004XN-9J; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3885 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEA12-0002KK-8Z; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:36:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7sddd4z.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:55:56 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187107 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 10483@debbugs.gnu.org, haj@posteo.de > Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:55:56 +0200 > > > In Emacs you use accept-process-output and a process sentinel. > > Which isn't very elegant, either. Elegance is in eyes of the beholder. FWIW, I think what we have is better suited for interactive program such as Emacs.