From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43269: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] provide a user feedback on Emacs being native compiled Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:26:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83pn6ujoqs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo15msrj.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuw9mmfe.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgbtm2d3.fsf@gnu.org> <062E9DA2-B039-4AAD-802B-7333971F5B73@gnu.org> <83ft7smjcd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7s7kpfr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo13j5i1.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuw6kgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgbqkc32.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, 43269@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 05:28:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDFq-0001QA-KI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:28:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDFo-00088I-UZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDFi-000888-Ez for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDFi-0002Xy-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDFi-0005VN-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43269 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43269-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43269.159970842521095 (code B ref 43269); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43269) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 03:27:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDEn-0005UB-3M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDEl-0005Ti-F4 for 43269@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDEg-0002U3-1G; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1734 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGDEX-00066D-3f; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:26:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 09 Sep 2020 21:51:53 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187714 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: rms@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, 43269@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 21:51:53 +0000 > > It should be said that, as we have improved compilation speed already by > about a factor five, we may be able to improve it further. But this is > where we stand today. Needless to say, I think that making this faster is very important.