From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 23:27:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83pn6h1pie.fsf@gnu.org> References: <> <<877dspmzo3.fsf@gnus.org>> <> <<28534d1c-6652-4cfe-acb4-f0a30624f878@default>> <<83tuvt1qwq.fsf@gnu.org>> <1cfba469-3adf-4287-a1fa-647e4e5e83e2@default> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15553"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com, 9917@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 5042@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 19 22:28:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjSw-0003vG-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 22:28:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjSv-0002I3-7s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjSm-0002He-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjSk-0004an-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjSk-0008Km-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 20:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9917 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 9917-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9917.160054724231983 (code B ref 9917); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 20:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9917) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2020 20:27:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjS6-0008Jh-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjS4-0008JQ-Pe; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjRy-0004Vw-U0; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4496 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJjRs-00039i-Tz; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:27:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1cfba469-3adf-4287-a1fa-647e4e5e83e2@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 19 Sep 2020 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188437 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 13:22:41 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com, > 9917@debbugs.gnu.org, 5042@debbugs.gnu.org > > My point is that a user can want _either_ behavior, > and there's no way to know which behavior is wanted > at any given moment, in any given buffer, whether > narrowed or not. > > IMO, we need either two different commands (& keys) > or a command with different prefix-arg behaviors. I suggested the former up-thread (and thought that your response meant you are unhappy about that for some reason). Different prefix-arg behaviors would be tricky in this case, I think, because goto-line accepts a numeric argument already.