From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44743: native-comp: confirm-exit-emacs warns about active processes when compiling Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83pn42u5fz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2iwz2eq.fsf@gnu.org> <87eekj8a4t.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17946"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: akrl@sdf.org, stefan@marxist.se, 44743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:43:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1khaTQ-0004VI-SO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:43:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khaTP-0000cj-JZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khaT8-0000cD-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khaT7-0003q1-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khaT7-0005cB-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44743.160623257321570 (code B ref 44743); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2020 15:42:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khaSz-0005bq-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khaSy-0005bb-8w for 44743@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:42:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khaSq-0003oW-2J; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:42:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3547 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1khaSo-0002jI-FO; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:42:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87eekj8a4t.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:52:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194080 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Andrea Corallo , stefan@marxist.se, 44743@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:52:18 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > FWIW, I think this should be controlled by a user option. It is not > > at all obvious that everyone would like compilation processes to be > > killed automatically, people might want to wait for them to complete. > > Since this is something that Emacs does automatically, in the > background, I don't think a user option sounds like something somebody > would want to tweak. IMO, we should offer an option precisely _because_ this is in background, thus the user could be unaware of the compilation being run. Since compilation takes non-negligible time, I envision users who'd like to wait for a few moments if that gave them faster Lisp next time. This is not unlike background subprocesses about which we do ask on exit.