From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44794: 28.0.50; Frame creation broken with (tool-bar-mode -1) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:22:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83pn36szfp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838satxufx.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8jpw813.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfetw4bf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuspczbw.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh2at6up.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37582"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, dfussner@googlemail.com, 44794@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 19 14:24:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcDj-0009eM-1H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:24:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcDh-0001nT-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:24:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcDM-0001ms-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:24:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcDJ-0005zc-Qq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcDJ-0008Cn-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:24:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44794.160838418531466 (code B ref 44794); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2020 13:23:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcCO-0008BS-QH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcCN-0008Al-42 for 44794@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcCH-0005i4-5k; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:22:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2142 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kqcCG-00056t-DP; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 08:22:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:07:36 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196385 Archived-At: > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 44794@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:07:36 +0100 > > > Martin, given what was found during investigation of bug#44002, do you > > agree the below should avoid re-introducing that bug? > > Hard to tell. There configureEvent.xconfigure.height being 1 was never > explicitly mentioned. My reading of https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44002#47 is that it was indeed 1x1. Citation: > > I at least think I understand the width/height mystery. The bogus > > window size returned is 1x1. Am I confused? > Do you want to put this into Emacs 27.2? No need, the problematic change is only on master, AFAICT.