From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45737: 27.1.50; Assertion failure in window_box_height Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:49:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83pn2egfuj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2fcf7ec9-8b85-e81f-6ae3-9d08abda8b3f@gmx.at> <8335zaig4t.fsf@gnu.org> <8d247025-528e-00a7-b92a-c59c775f6968@gmx.at> <83zh1igwt0.fsf@gnu.org> <48610ec3-59d8-575f-4360-598077630266@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23997"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45737@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 18:50:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyINQ-00066G-QH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 18:50:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyINP-0007RO-Oa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyING-0007QU-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyING-0002V0-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyING-0003fX-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 17:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45737-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45737.161021459814089 (code B ref 45737); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 17:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2021 17:49:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyINB-0003fA-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:49:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyINA-0003em-Ct for 45737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:49:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyIN4-0002PW-VJ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4716 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kyIN4-0001y2-Af; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:49:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <48610ec3-59d8-575f-4360-598077630266@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 9 Jan 2021 18:06:53 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197565 Archived-At: > Cc: 45737@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 18:06:53 +0100 > > > If that is the effect, then I'm okay with installing this on emacs-27, > > but I wonder whether we could do better on master, so as to ensure > > that at least one screen line of the mini-window is still visible? > > That would be better indeed. But I suppose this would require to > implement zero-height windows, something you didn't like when we > discussed it about a year ago. Can you help me understand why this would mean zero-height windows? What I had in mind was to constraint resizing so that the min-window is always at least 1-line high. In any case, please install the fix on emacs-27.